* Open Source Optional
Posted on July 6th, 2008 by Dave Johnson. Filed under opensource.
One of the more interesting things I came across in my blog reading this weekend was the release of the second generation Openmoko phone. The Openmoko phone is the phone for the FOSS community with even the CAD files for building the phone available under a Creative Commons license and a price just shy of $400 USD.
The question that I have is how many open source developers and evangelists out there that are building their applications on free and open source software like Linux, Apache and Ruby on Rails or that work for open source organizations like the Mozilla Foundation or that are evangelizing open standards like OpenID are going to get on board with the most open mobile device available? How many of them are going to trade in their fancy closed source IPhone - for which Apple has applied for more than 200 patents - for an Openmoko phone? I would wager that very few will.
I would expect that all open source proponents who refuse Microsoft software because of their closed, software patenting ways would likewise refuse a proprietary hardware device form Apple in favour of an open alternative and yet people are still probably more than happy to stick with their favourite pomaceous fruit designed in California.
So who swears by open source and is going to keep their IPhone or other smart phone?
3 Responses to “Open Source Optional”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- BlackBerry JavaScript Oddities
- JavaScript Event Merging
- Smart Grid Utilities
- PhoneGap Desktop
- Crockford Facts
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
July 6th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
The biggest question is this:
Can it make a phone call?
All the other features are absolutely meaningless if it can’t do this simple function. The first generation OpenMoko couldn’t, and that is the main reason why I stayed away. The iPhone appears to be able to do this. The hardcore F/OSS people will use this, but I don’t think anyone is going to abandon a working phone for something that is a work in progress.
I don’t give a crap about all the other features if it can’t make and receive phone calls. That includes openness. A rock is very open, but it’s just a damn rock!
July 7th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Joe’s point is totally important: the key is useful and usable product. More people care about the utility of their tools than the ethics behind them.
July 9th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Important yes. However, from my experience people are willing to go through a lot of pain just to get some FOSS software working or put up with shit software so that they don’t have to use the latest offering from Microsoft. While I am sure there would be many arguments about security, performance etc, the fact is there are A LOT of people out there using technologies like ASP.NET because it is actually better (and not just because I am doing a .NET project right now
in terms of performance and productivity. Or consider Drupal - it is complete shit and people _love_ despite there being other, better non FOSS solutions. Those Drupal zealots are exactly the type of people that will be getting (or have) IPhones too.